Join RecordSetter
By clicking “Create Account“, you agree that you've read and understand the Terms of Use. Your email address will always be kept private.
RecordSetter Update
Hey there!
We’re making some changes at RecordSetter to get your videos seen by more fans! Here’s what it could mean for you:
- First-look consideration to appear in books, TV shows & ad campaigns, and to share revenue as we distribute your videos online
- The chance to go Pro with our RecordSetter Pro YouTube community
To participate in revenue sharing and special projects, we need your agreement on our updated Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
PLEASE READ THESE TERMS OF USE CAREFULLY AND FREQUENTLY, AS THEY CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION REGARDING YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS.
These Terms of Use, and any rights and licenses granted within these Terms of Use, may not be transferred or assigned by you, but may be transferred or assigned by RecordSetter without restriction.
1. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
RecordSetter is an Internet-based service that permits users to view world records and submit their own world records. RecordSetter may contain advertisements, which are necessary to continue providing RecordSetter's services. RecordSetter is not responsible for third party advertisements or third party applications that are posted on the RecordSetter sites, nor is it responsible for the products provided by its advertisers.
2. MODIFICATIONS TO SERVICE
RecordSetter reserves the right to modify or terminate the RecordSetter sites for any reason at any time, temporarily or permanently, without prior notice. This includes, but is not limited to, the sale of RecordSetter to another entity. You agree that RecordSetter will not be liable to you for any modification or termination of the RecordSetter sites.
3. TERMINATION
RecordSetter reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to refuse service to anyone, temporarily or permanently, at any time. You agree that any termination of your ability to use RecordSetter, including, but not limited to, the termination of your permission to use the RecordSetter sites, may occur without prior notice. You also agree that any world records you hold on the RecordSetter sites (your "Records") may be repealed without prior notice. Furthermore, RecordSetter reserves the right, at its sole discretion, to reject a User's Record submission, at any time and for any reason without prior notice.
YOUR PERMISSION TO USE THE RECORDSETTER SITES AUTOMATICALLY TERMINATES IF YOU VIOLATE ANY OF THESE TERMS OF USE. ANY RECORDS YOU HOLD MAY BE REPEALED AT ANY TIME IF RECORDSETTER SUSPECTS THAT YOU ARE NOT COMPLYING WITH THESE REQUIREMENTS.
4. ELIGIBILITY
Access and use of RecordSetter is void where prohibited. By accessing and using RecordSetter, you agree that:
* You are responsible for knowing and complying with all applicable rules regarding Internet use, including, but not limited to, local laws and regulations relating to acceptable on-line conduct and content;
* You will not use RecordSetter or any aspect of RecordSetter for any unlawful purpose or in any manner that violates these Terms of Use;
* You are at least 18 years of age, or if you are younger than 18 years of age, you have parental permission to use the RecordSetter sites. If you are younger than 13 years of age, your parent may need to provide verifiable parental consent in order for you to use certain features of the site, such as submitting Records, which RecordSetter will obtain at the time you attempt to use those features;
* All information, including, but not limited to, personal information and information relating to Records, that you submit to RecordSetter is truthful, accurate, and complete; and
* You will maintain the truthfulness, accuracy, and completeness of all information, including, but not limited to, personal information and information relating to Records, submitted to RecordSetter. This includes, but is not limited to, promptly notifying RecordSetter if any information, including, but not limited to, personal information and information relating to Records, changes.
5. PROPRIETARY RIGHTS IN SITE CONTENT
You understand and agree that the content on the RecordSetter sites, except any data,
text, information, screen names, graphics, photos, accounts, audio and video
clips, links, or any other material (collectively "Content") uploaded, posted,
or otherwise transmitted by a User, is owned or licensed to RecordSetter and is
protected by applicable intellectual property and other laws. Except as
expressly authorized by RecordSetter, you agree not to modify, distribute, create
derivative works based on, rent, lease, loan, sell, resell, or offer for any
commercial purposes the RecordSetter sites, in whole or in part.
You further understand and agree that the content of sponsor advertisements that
appear on the RecordSetter sites is protected by applicable intellectual property law
and other laws. Except as expressly authorized by the applicable advertiser, you
agree not to modify, distribute, create derivative works based on, rent, lease,
loan, sell, resell, or offer for any commercial purposes the sponsor
advertisement, in whole or in part.
The RecordSetter service makes it possible to post images and text hosted on RecordSetter to
outside websites. This use is permitted as long as pages on other websites which
display data hosted on the RecordSetter sites provide an easily identifiable link back
to RecordSetter.
6. WORLD RECORDS
RecordSetter is not and cannot be responsible for its User's or other's conduct or safety during any attempt to create a world record to submit to RecordSetter. BY USING AND ACCESSING THE RECORDSETTER SITES, YOU UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT YOU ATTEMPT TO CREATE A WORLD RECORD AT YOUR OWN RISK. If you do become involved in an attempt to create a world record, including, but not limited to, your own attempt to create a world record or supporting another User's attempt to create a world record, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, you release RecordSetter and its officers, directors, employees, and agents from any and all claims, administrative proceedings, demands, damages, obligations, losses, costs, debts, liabilities, and expenses, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, known and unknown, suspected and unsuspected, disclosed and undisclosed, arising out of or in any way connected with the attempt to create a world record.
7. USER CONDUCT
You are solely responsible for your conduct on the RecordSetter sites and any Content that you post to the site. RecordSetter reserves the right to investigate and take appropriate actions a Inappropriate User conduct and Content includes, but is not limited to:
* impersonating another person or entity or falsely stating or otherwise misrepresenting your affiliation with another person or entity;
* uploading, posting, or otherwise transmitting any Content that RecordSetter determines is harmful, abusive, harassing, threatening, hateful, vulgar, obscene, fraudulent, unlawful, tortious, defamatory, libelous, invasive to another person's or entity's privacy, exploitive, or racially, ethnically, or otherwise objectionable;
* engaging in behavior that harms minors in any way, as seen by RecordSetter or applicable law, or that is otherwise destructive behavior, including, but not limited to, abusing, harassing, stalking, threatening, or intimidating another person or entity;
* using or attempting to use any information obtained from the RecordSetter sites in order to harm, abuse, harass, stalk, threaten, or intimidate another person or entity;
* using the RecordSetter sites to create or submit any unsolicited or unauthorized advertising, email, or other form of communication;
* soliciting personal information from anyone under 18;
* promoting commercial activities without prior written consent from RecordSetter, including, but not limited to, contests, sweepstakes, barter, advertising, or pyramid schemes;
* collecting or storing User information for commercial or unlawful purposes;
* modifying, adapting, hacking or otherwise manipulating any part of the RecordSetter sites;
* modifying, adapting, hacking or otherwise manipulating any part of another website so as to falsely imply that it is associated with RecordSetter or to otherwise disguise the origin of the information delivered;
* interfering with, disrupting, or otherwise creating an undue burden on the RecordSetter servers or connected networks, or disobeying any requirements, procedures, policies, or regulations of connected networks;
* circumventing, modifying, or otherwise interfering with any security technology or software that is part of the RecordSetter sites;
* uploading, posting, or otherwise transmitting software worms, bots, viruses, or any other code of a destructive nature;
* using the RecordSetter sites in any manner, intentionally or unintentionally, that violates these Terms of Use or any applicable laws or regulations;
* using the RecordSetter sites in any manner that furthers or promotes any criminal activity or enterprise or provides instructional information about illegal activities; and
* allowing another person to use the RecordSetter sites in any manner that violates these Terms of Use.
While RecordSetter prohibits inappropriate conduct and Content on the site, you understand and agree that RecordSetter cannot be responsible for other User's conduct or the Content posted on the RecordSetter sites and you may be exposed to such inappropriate conduct or Content when you visit the RecordSetter sites.
8. RIGHTS IN USER CONTENT
“User Content” is Content that is posted by a User to the RecordSetter sites. By adding or uploading User Content to the RecordSetter sites, you are transferring ownership of such User Content to RecordSetter, including, but not limited to, any intellectual property rights you may have in such User Content. Such transfer irrevocably grants to RecordSetter the sole and exclusive worldwide ownership of all right, title and interest, (fully-paid, royalty-free, licensable and transferable (in whole or part) in and to the User Content and all elements thereof and the fully-paid, royalty-free, licensable and transferable (in whole or part) worldwide license to all embedded third-party copyrights, trademarks, patents, trade secrets, privacy and publicity rights and other intellectual and industrial property rights that you own or control, to use, reproduce, transmit, display, exhibit, distribute, index, comment on, modify, edit, adapt, translate, create derivative works based upon, perform and otherwise exploit such User Content, in whole or in part, in RecordSetter’s sole discretion, in all media formats and channels now known or hereafter devised (including, but not limited to, on websites, cable and broadcast television networks and stations, on broadband and wireless platforms, products and services, on physical media, and in theatrical release) for any and all purposes including, without limitation, entertainment, news, advertising, promotional, marketing, publicity, trade or commercial purposes, all without further notice to you or the foregoing third-party(ies), with or without attribution, and without the requirement of any permission from or payment to You or to any other person or entity.
In addition, by uploading User Content to the RecordSetter sites, you understand and agree that RecordSetter may, in its sole discretion, deploy, disseminate, publish, upload, and transfer such User Content to the YouTube and Facebook websites for the purposes of monetizing such User Content and maximizing advertising revenue generated by such User Content. Such revenue shall be shared with you under the terms and conditions of the agreement located at so long as you consent to the terms and conditions of such agreement and provide us with the information we need to forward such revenue to you.
By uploading, posting, or otherwise transmitting any User Content, you represent and warrant that (1) you have all necessary written consents, releases, or permissions to grant the foregoing licenses to RecordSetter; (2) you have all necessary written consents, releases, or permissions of each and every identifiable individual person in the User Content to use the name or likeness of that person in the manner contemplated by RecordSetter and these Terms of Use; and (3) the uploading, posting, or otherwise transmitting your User Content on or through RecordSetter does not violate the legal rights of any person or entity, including, but not limited to, privacy rights, publicity rights, copyrights, trademark rights, or contract rights. WITHOUT LIMITATION TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 15, BELOW, YOU AGREE TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND, AND HOLD HARMLESS RECORDSETTER AND ITS OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS, FROM AND AGAINST ANY CLAIM, ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING, DEMAND, DAMAGE, OBLIGATION, LOSS, COST, DEBT, LIABILITY, OR EXPENSE, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, REASONABLE ATTORNEY'S FEES, MADE BY ANY THIRD PARTY DUE TO OR ARISING FROM YOUR BREACH OF THE FOREGOING REPRESENTATION AND WARRANTY, OR RECORDSETTER'S USE, COPYING, PUBLISHING, DISTRIBUTION, TRANSMISSION, TRANSFERENCE, CREATION OF DERIVATIVE WORKS OF, PUBLIC PERFORMANCE, OR PUBLIC DISPLAY (IN WHATEVER MEDIA, AT OUR SOLE DISCRETION) OF ANY USER CONTENT SUBMITTED BY YOU.
9. COPYRIGHT
RecordSetter undertakes to obey all relevant copyright laws. If you believe your copyrighted material appears on the RecordSetter site without your permission, please send us in writing:
A physical or electronic signature of a person authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed; Identification of the copyrighted work claimed to have been infringed, or, if multiple copyrighted works are covered by a single notification, a representative list of such works; Identification of the material that is claimed to be infringing or to be the subject of infringing activity and that is to be removed or access to which is to be disabled and information reasonably sufficient to permit RecordSetter to locate the material; Information reasonably sufficient to permit RecordSetter to contact you, such as an address, telephone number, and, if available, an e-mail address; A statement that you have a good faith belief that use of the material in the manner complained of is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law; and A statement that the information in the notification is accurate, and under penalty of perjury, that you are authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.
Our designated agent ("Copyright Agent") to receive notification of claimed
infringement under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998 ("DMCA") is
Corey Henderson, RecordSetter, 228 Park Ave South, Suite 29280, New York, NY 10003-1502, [email protected], 646-912-6611 (phone), 206-600-4433 (fax).
After receiving a claim of infringement, RecordSetter will process and investigate the claims. Upon receipt of notices that comply or substantially comply with the DMCA's requirements, RecordSetter will act expeditiously to remove or disable access to any Content alleged to be infringing. RecordSetter will take reasonable steps to promptly notify the User that it has removed or disabled access to the User's Content.
If you believe your removed Content is not infringing, or that you have the legal authorization to post and use the removed Content, you may provide us with a counter notification by sending our Copyright Agent the following information in writing: Your physical or electronic signature; Identification of the Content that has been removed or to which access has been disabled and the location at which the material appeared before it was removed or access to it was disabled; A statement under penalty of perjury that you have a good faith belief that the material was removed or disabled as a result of mistake or misidentification of the material to be removed or disabled; and Your name, address, and telephone number, and a statement that you consent to the jurisdiction of Federal District Court for the judicial district in which your address is located, or if your address is outside of the United States, for any judicial district in which RecordSetter may be found, and that you will accept service of process from the person who provided the original DMCA notification or an agent of such person.
Upon receipt of a proper counter notification under the DMCA, RecordSetter will promptly provide the person who provided the initial notification of claimed infringement with a copy of the counter notification. Additionally, RecordSetter will inform that person that it will replace the removed material and cease disabling access to it in 10-14 business days following receipt of the counter notice, unless RecordSetter's Copyright Agent first receives notice from the person who submitted the initial notification that such person has filed an action seeking a court order to restrain the subscriber from engaging in infringing activity relating to the material on RecordSetter.
10. USER DISPUTES
You are solely responsible for your interactions with other Users. RecordSetter has no obligation to become involved in any dispute between you and other Users (a "User Dispute"). However, RecordSetter reserves the right to become involved in any User Dispute at RecordSetter's sole discretion.
If you do become involved in a User Dispute, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, you release RecordSetter and its officers, directors, employees, and agents from any and all claims, administrative proceedings, demands, damages, obligations, losses, costs, debts, liabilities, and expenses, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, known and unknown, suspected and unsuspected, disclosed and undisclosed, arising out of or in any way connected with the User Dispute.
11. PRIVACY
Your use of RecordSetter is governed by our Privacy Policy, which is incorporated into these Terms of Use by this reference. By using or accessing RecordSetter, you agree that you have read, understand, and agree to be bound by our Privacy Policy.
12. Links
The RecordSetter sites may contain links to third-party websites that are not owned or controlled by RecordSetter. RecordSetter cannot control and assumes no liability or responsibility for the availability, content, or practices of third-party websites. RecordSetter's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy are applicable only when you are on the RecordSetter sites. As such, we encourage you to read the policies of any third-party websites that you visit when you leave the RecordSetter sites.
13. DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES
YOUR USE OF RECORDSETTER IS AT YOUR SOLE RISK. RECORDSETTER IS PROVIDED ON AN "AS IS" AND "AS AVAILABLE" BASIS. TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, RECORDSETTER, ITS OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS EXPRESSLY DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, WHETHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE ACCURACY AND RELIABILITY OF USER CONTENT AND THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, AND NON-INFRINGEMENT. RECORDSETTER MAKES NO WARRANTY THAT THE SERVICE WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, DELAY-FREE, SECURE, OR ERROR-FREE. RECORDSETTER IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE DUE TO TECHNICAL PROBLEMS OR MALFUNCTION, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY INJURY OR DAMAGE TO ANY PERSON'S COMPUTER RELATED TO OR RESULTING FROM USE OF THE RECORDSETTER SITES OR DOWNLOADING MATERIALS IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OF THE RECORDSETTER SITES.
UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL RECORDSETTER BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING PERSONAL INJURY OR DEATH, RESULTING FROM THE USE OF THE RECORDSETTER SITES OR CONDUCT OCCURRING IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OF THE RECORDSETTER SITES. THIS INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE IN CONNECTION WITH AN ATTEMPT TO CREATE A WORLD RECORD.
NOTHING HEREIN SHALL BE DEEMED TO CREATE AN AGENCY, PARTNERSHIP, JOINT VENTURE, EMPLOYEE-EMPLOYER, OR FRANCHISOR-FRANCHISEE RELATIONSHIP OF ANY TYPE BETWEEN RECORDSETTER AND ANY OTHER PARTY. THESE TERMS OF USE ARE BETWEEN RECORDSETTER AND YOU AND THEY DO NOT, NOR SHALL THEY BE DEEMED TO, EXTEND RIGHTS TO ANY THIRD PARTY.
14. LIABILITY LIMITATIONS
YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, RECORDSETTER, ITS OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, EMPLOYEES, OR AGENTS, SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, EXEMPLARY, SPECIAL, PUNITIVE, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES WHATSOEVER, EVEN IF RECORDSETTER HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES, RESULTING FROMDAMAGES, RESULTING FROM
THE USE OR INABILITY TO USE THE SERVICE; ERRORS, MISTAKES, OR INACCURACIES OF CONTENT; PERSONAL INJURY OR PROPERTY DAMAGE, OF ANY NATURE WHATSOEVER, RESULTING FROM YOUR USE AND ACCESS TO, OR IN CONNECTION WITH YOUR USE OR ACCESS TO, OUR WEBSITE; ANY UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR PERSONAL INFORMATION; STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE SERANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE SERVICE.TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, THE AGGREGATE LIABILITY OF RECORDSETTER, ITS OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS TO YOU OR ANY THIRD PARTIES IN ANY CIRCUMSTANCE IS LIMITED TO $100.
15. INDEMNITY
You agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless RECORDSETTER and its officers, directors, employees, and agents, from and against any and all claims, administrative proceedings, demands, damages, obligations, losses, costs, debts, liabilities, and expenses, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, made by any third party due to or arising from:
Your use and access to, or in connection with your use or access to, the RECORDSETTER sites; Your violation of any terms of these Terms of Use; Your violation of any third party's right, including, but not limited to, any copyright or privacy right; and/or Any claim that your User Content caused damage to the third party.
16. JURISDICTION AND DISPUTES
You understand and agree that the RecordSetter sites shall be deemed solely based in the State of New York ("New York"). The RecordSetter sites shall be deemed passive websites that do not give rise to personal jurisdiction over RecordSetter either specific or general, in jurisdictions other than New York, nor shall use of or access to the RecordSetter sites be construed as the purposeful availment of the benefits or privilege of doing business in any state other than New York by RecordSetter. You understand and agree that, except to the extent applicable law, if any, provides otherwise, any claim or cause of action arising out of the use of or access to the RecordSetter sites or these Terms of Use shall be governed by the substantive laws of New York, without respect to its conflict of laws principles. You further understand and agree not to bring claims or causes of action on a representative, class member basis, or as a private attorney general.
You and RecordSetter understand and agree that regardless of any statute or law to the contrary, any claim or cause of action arising out of or related to use of or access to the RecordSetter sites or these Terms of Use must be filed within one (1) year after the claim or cause of action arose. Otherwise, such claim or cause of action is permanently barred. To the extent a claim or cause of action does arise from the use or access to the RecordSetter sites or these Terms of Use, the claim or cause of action shall be settled by binding arbitration. RecordSetter may elect to resolve the dispute by binding arbitration conduct by telephone, on-line, or based solely upon written submissions where no in-person appearance is required. If in-person appearance is required, it shall be held in New York County, New York, or another location mutually agreed upon by the parties. In all such cases, the arbitration shall be held in the English language and administered by the American Arbitration Association or Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. in accordance with their applicable rules then in effect, or any other established ADR provider mutually agreed upon by the parties. Any judgment on the award rendered by the arbitrator may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. Notwithstanding the foregoing, each party shall have the right to institute an action in a court of proper jurisdiction for preliminary injunctive relief pending a final decision by the arbitrator, and the proper venue for any disputes arising out of or relating to any of the same will be the state and federal courts located in New York County, New York. You hereby consent to, and waive all defenses of lack of personal jursidiction and forum non conveniens with respect to, venue and jurisdiction in the state and federal courts of New York Count, New York.
17. WAIVER AND SEVERABILITY OF TERMS
The failure of RecordSetter to exercise or enforce any right or provision of these Terms of Use shall not constitute a waiver of such right or provision. If a court of competent jurisdiction finds any provision of these Terms of Use to be invalid, the court should give effect to the parties' intentions as reflected in the provision, and all other provisions of these Terms of Use remain in full force and effect.
18. VIOLATIONS OF TERMS OF USE
Please report any suspected violations of these Terms of Use to [email protected]
19. QUESTIONS
Please contact us at [email protected] with any questions regarding these Terms of Use.
In order to proceed you need to agree to the terms below. Feel free to contact us if you would like to discuss.
Marietta, Georgia, United States / August 5, 2011
Sam Clark played "Flight of the Bumblebee" on his guitar at 700 BPM.
DENIED: Submission lacks sufficient evidence.
- no overdubbing allowed
- must strum strings in advance to demontrate you are playing through an amp or use acoustic guitar
- must begin attempt by playing song at original speed alongside a midi track that plays notes perfectly and match every note
- must repeat performance at a gradually increasing tempos to demonstrate full knowledge of song
- category creators must submit tablature for moderators to look at and to ensure challengers follow original performance
- analog clock must be present in frame for duration of attempt
- must follow form of current world record holder
- must provide video evidence
Embed
Tags: fastest, music, playing, guitar, musical, chords
Comments
History (6)
Current
NirvanaBista on 11/11/2015
999Denied
TaylorSterling on 3/3/2012
1,350Denied
DH on 12/1/2011
750Denied
TiagoDellaVega on 10/16/2011
700Denied
SamClark on 8/5/2011
700Original
SamClark on 8/1/2011
chipku
ETAP Crack is one of the best tools to cut / paste data features. The positive and negative panels are also confirmed. In addition, it easily draws the motherboard structures, electrical structures, and many others by the creation of PCB circuits. With the 256-bit integration, you can also work on your Android and Mac OS X without problems. It also works easily on the administrator mode. It works the immersive system where you can easily Draw the structures of Home electrical circuits and conductors. Moreover, ETAP 20 Crack has the ability to support both Mac and Windows software.
ETAP Torrent tool has a lot of new options or improvements like the performance speed is currently 50X faster. It also comes with an enhanced result visual image with a multi-scope. ETAP Download with Crack has a new administration block check routine. This program also allows you to export one-lines or data blocks to AutoCAD drawing files. ETAP Crack download supports line ohmic resistance calculations. Moreover, it has a user-friendly interface. ETAP Crack
Miracle Box Crack is a powerful tool that is used for data flashing and reformate modern smartphones. it allows users to access mobile devices via USB cable. This tool performs reading and writing on their safe powerful sections. It includes bootloader and OS flash locations that are setting for optimal performance of those devices. Miracle Box is a dongle device that allows users to use their professional tools. Miracle Box Crack powerful hardware component of a computer that connects to the port and other devices. It provides the new software with additional functionality. Also, the Miracle Box With Crack tool is the smallest and fastest, driver-less solution program. It provides more than 5,000 + mobile FRP solutions to the thunder Edition. Miracle thunder program users can flash or unlock the mobile device by choosing a mobile number or CPU.
Miracle Box Crack Download is a professional mobile phone system manager and data flashing tool. It is used to successfully flash or reformat modern smartphone and tablet devices. This professional tool allows users to access mobile devices via USB cable. Also, it can be used to perform reading and writing on their safety storage sections. It includes bootloader and OS flash locations that are used for optimal performance of those devices. Miracle Box Without Box tool is officially released on 1st April 2021. So, the thunder Edition of Miracle Box helps more than millions of mobile phone models. Miracle Box Thunder Edition is one of the most famous tools in the world and the only complete Box for repairing Chinese cell phones. You can solve many issues with your Chinese android devices such as flashing firmware, repair IMEI, unlock the sim network, etc. Miracle Box Crack
Diana Mowery
wonderful
Bishwajit choudhury
Best
why not
Cool www.whynotdownload.com
why not
Cool www.whynotdownload.com
steven smith
This is insane o.O this website is indeed awesome, I am seeing so much talent
subrat gogoi
this is fucking fake video. Observe his body movements after bpm is increased.
Gary L.
Green screen much?
Sergey
is there some sort of fake-checking on this website, or they accept any video and say it's a record. Having clock and a moving person on the background in 2016 doesn't prove anything, unless there was an actual sort of judge standing in that room + a machine which slows this ridiculousness down and checks that there were actual notes from a composition played, not just sliding accross fretboard pretending it's a flight of a bumblebee.
ZOMBIE
It says record was denied
Dylan Knisley
Looks like Taylor Sterling gave up on breaking this record, lol.
Fernando Coutinho
Good sir, this is fucking annoying.
fastestshredder
I thought you shredded totally awesome on that 999 bpm thing. that was crisp man.
fastestshredder
hey i like to play fast. cheers
-fastestshredder
mark taylor
My god, why is recordsetter allowing comments like the ones from Sexton Hardcastle. He should be banned from this site. His comments to that woman he doesn't even know are disgusting and ridiculous. Please delete his comments and ban him from your site.
PeteM
This is why I think this record needs to be renamed fastest rendition of Flight of the Bumblebees. Let's see some more speed playing of other songs guys!
Nancy Kate Phillippi
Yes, I agree with Ma-Ann. Why can we not just be glad Taylor had fun trying, be happy that John Taylor has the record, and do something else in life? Ok? And although I personally think that Taylor should have kept the record, those of you yelling at James Moody are WRONG. He stated he was not just mad 'cause someone beat John Taylor, he said clearly he just wanted an accurate player. He said he was FINE with someone.beating it as long as they were accurate. And, notice he did it without swearing.
Nancy Kate Phillippi
I agree with Leigh: the rules at the time said nothing as to perfection, and I think you COULD just keep changing the rules to bend who was the holder.
Rob Hutchison
You Rock...Taylor it is awesome...........well done.
Kyle Maplesden
fags, he made it...
rebecca green
Wow obviously we have some very jelouse people here and also some people very fond of John Taylor!! I dont see why Taylor Sterlings record attempt should be denied because two people have disagreed! I know its definetly legit!! My partner who has played guitar for 19 years thinks Taylor Rocks!! And although he did say in the guitar world fast is not necessarily the best he has seen alot of other videos which prove Taylor is a very talented kid!! Rock on Taylor!!!!!!!!!
Dan Rollman
Based on community feedback below and on Facebook, we have made the decision to deny Taylor's submission. Moving forwards, we will develop a firm set of rules that future competitors in this category must follow.
Please note that the model we're building for RecordSetter RELIES on community input. This debate has been a great learning experience for us. Moving forwards, you'll see a lot more tools become available that will allow you to moderate categories in which you have expertise. Think Wikipdedia.
JohnTaylor (and friends), we hear your frustrations loud and clear. Our team is small, but we're moving as quickly as possible to build a system that allows submissions to be denied before we incorrectly label them as world records. I truly hope you'll bear with us.
James Moody
Hiroaki, upload a video of it!
Hiroaki Mori
世界最速のギター弾きなんだそうで。
James Moody
Ok. at 999 BPM the hands would be nothing but a blur, especially the picking hand. He is not playing this accurately or this would be so.. if you compute what SHOULD be his notes per second at 999 BPM, you get 66.6 notes per second, being picked cleanly. Obviously he is not picking 66.6 notes persecond, or his hand would be so fast you couldn't even see it.
Notes per Beat x BPM / 60 seconds = Notes Per Second
4 x 999 / 60 = 66.6
Nicolas James
Taylor, Mr. Sterling i have no issue saying that some one beat John's record, if they prove they beat it correctly, i do not have a problum with it at all, i just personaly know John Taylor and i want his record to be beaten with true respect.
Nicolas James
james, sir i have heard your slowed down version of his so called record. and after it gave me a head ake i swore i heard that Taylor slid a few times, none of the endings he did were the same at all. and what infuriates me the most is that he wont even admit that he messed up. if he would admit that he messed up, and would agree to try again, and in the video pan out to the crowd, have a clock in the video, and have this Level 9 classical guitar whosa ma call it, then no one would deny his record. but i believe his biggest foult is not truely following the guidlines.
Taylor Sterling
Ma-Ann I have just sent them now if you need to contact me any further contact me via my hotmail account as i am not commenting on record setter anymore thank you and, regards Taylor Sterling
MaAnn P.
Taylor. you can send them at ma-ann at recordsetter dot com. Also, would appreciate it if you could provide contact details of them, phone or e-mail. thanks taylor!
Franklin King
how is 1,350 BPM denied and 1,100 pending?
Taylor Sterling
MA-ANN Yeah sure i can, i can provide a witness statment that is registered with a Guitar Institute of London (one of the most prestiges) that is Level 9 in classical guitar. And also one who has had over 25 years of Guitar teaching expirience and is one of australias most well known teachers. Where would you like me to send them?
James Moody
Anyone with ears can tell it's not accurate. You don't even need to see the witness statements, especially if the witness is "oh, so reliable" to think that this was a flawless attempt being performed in front of his/her very eyes. Needs to be revoked.
MaAnn P.
Taylor. Do you have any written statements from one of your witnesses, most preferably a music expert, to back up your claim? Surely, we would love to hear other expert's opinion on this matter.
James Moody
Record Setter needs to give this title back to John Taylor. Taylor Sterling record is a JOKE. It isn't accurate, the ending is played 3 different ways, even at the slowest speed, you can hear mistakes and off time passages. Record Setter, you are going to lose respect from the guitar community if you do not take the time to examine this issue. I am a professional guitarist, I know for a fact that this is not accurate, and anyone with ears can tell as well. This is starting to become one big joke of a record. If the kid actually did it for real, it would be different, but he didn't, it's horrible. Not record worthy. Seriously, what does it take to show the people who run this site that this video is crap after the 300BPM mark.. and I'm giving it ALOT of leeway.
James Moody
Nicolas, you are exactly right. I've provided the slowed down sample, and you can hear that it is OBVIOUSLY NOT ACCURATE, so I don't know why record setter hasn't taken it down yet.
Nicolas James
oh also sorry about my selling. i know its bad and iv excepted it. :P
Nicolas James
Okay, Taylor, im not going to just critisize you. but i am going to just simply say this, I personaly know John Taylor, I have Seen him play at 600 BPM with my own eyes, i have even seen him play at 800. and you sir have no right calling him a cheat. but you sir the main reason no one believes you accualy broke this record is this, it sounds like you did not finish the song the say way twice. second Weres the clock? how do we honestly know that this was in real time? i and obviously see you are quite talented, but your letting your ego, and your eragance cloud your judgement. are you seriously going to be that person who calls the previous people who won the record cheats? are you really that person who cant honestly admit that you made a mistake? dude your human, except it, and grow a pair and try again. i know John Taylor Desirves that record because he's put in the time and effort to make it perfect, and i truely believe that the person to take the title from him should prove that they earned it, in his video at Guitar Center (which i was also their for) he even admited he made a mistake, and he redid it at that speed. I know your going to come back at me with some probly very eragent and snoody remark. but know this, it ends when you admit its not perfect.
Kim Lawson
Aussie, Aussie, Aussie.............Oi, Oi, Oi!!!
James Moody
Well, I think we can all see that you are very afraid to lose your record, because you know it wasn't accurate. If you aren't willing to prove the claims you make, then you shouldn't be allowed to have the record in the first place, so just go run off and hide, like all other little kids do. Keep claiming that you have done something that you haven't, and good luck with GWR, you're gonna need it.
Taylor Sterling
And guinness will be provided with backing tracks and everything they need when they unfreeze the record So good by good sir.
Taylor Sterling
Im saying della vega could play at 750 its just the video makes him look like a cheat having motion blur applied to the file through after effects to make it look SUPER fast. And you have only provided a slowed down performance it proves nothing because there is nothing wrong with my record.
End of story, I will not be postnig anymore on record setter because theres nothing wrong with my record Good by good sir!
James Moody
Man, you really need to get your stories straight. You are making no sense now.. Are you trying to say Vega didn't cheat, he did cheat, John cheated?? What are you saying? Let's put it this way... I've been providing evidence against your record claim. How about YOU provide evidence to back up it's authenticity. Give us some proof.. as in, a slowed down video, or a link to your backing track, or something to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that you actually played every note cleary, every line the same way each time, at each speed, because instead of proving your claim against my accusations, all you have done is bash other players. Think that makes you look very legit? It does not.
Taylor Sterling
My record is Tottaly Legit anyone who says otherwise is being nieve or a massive fan of the previous 2 record holders.
Taylor Sterling
I agree the video was made to look speed up because of it "adds" to how fast he is playing i believe della vega could play it at that speed.
I dont here the guitar sound or the backing track to be speed up just the guitar being HEAVILY compressed making it sound SUPER fast like how it does in his orginal world record video in 2008.
I never expressed that tiago della vega's video was fake
Nancy Kate Phillippi
Wait Taylor, what exactly are you saying here? You keep acting as if you are trying to hold your record, then you suddenly switch to telling everyone Tiago Della Vega was not a cheater. I think at this point we've all established his video was sped up and should be denied. Do you disagree with that? Why?
Taylor Sterling
how did the cheater get a world record then? did you know guinness dont even get their own music expert in to analyze the videos?
And yeah john taylor got the record in hong kong on new years eve by a music expert inlisted by the company sponsoring the event do you think they would say "oh no you got it wrong sorry guys go home"? of course they will say it to get into history and have a good time at the end of the night! AND WHERE IS THE VIDEO OF HIM DOING IT IN HONG KONG, Surely you would have someone film it yourself seems a bit odd to me.
I am the real deal not those two!
ONCE AGAIN I DO NOT POST COMMENTS ABOUT OTHER GUITARIST THE ONLY REASON I AM NOW IS BECAUSE I AM BEING FORCED TO DEFEND MYSELF.
Taylor Sterling
your calling della vega a cheater i beat he can play it at 750BPM its just it wasn't a good idea to upload that video with all the effects on it. now everyone thinks he is a cheater he just cant play melodicaly. he can play fast
And if hes a cheater in your mind i think we all know who else has a guinness world record and isn't very good in his attempts
HE IS NOT WORTHY OF THE TITLE MAYBE HE CAN BUY AN AMP THATS WORTH MORE THAN 50 DOLLARS AND PLAY IT AGAIN. wait he wont cause he knows he cant.
ONCE AGAIN I DO NOT POST COMMENTS ABOUT OTHER GUITARIST THE ONLY REASON I AM NOW IS BECAUSE I AM BEING FORCED TO DEFEND MYSELF.
James Moody
This argument is not about Vega, It is about you, and getting a record for something that you actually didn't do. GWR will not accept your attempt, I guarantee it. In fact I would bet money on it, So why does record setter? Verification is the word people. Authenticate, verify, listen, and compare.
THIS IS NOT WORTHY OF THE TITLE
James Moody
The Vega 340 BPM was never a world record. It was a publicity stunt that Vega did for orange amps. The announcement of what Vega did after 340BPM, being a world record was a lie. GWE still slows down the song to inspect for accuracy, even when they watch you live, Like they did to John Taylor on new years, in Hong Kong for the 620BPM. The GWR book that is current has Vanny Tonon in it for the world record at 340 BPM for 2012. That is solid proof that Vega never had the record for 340BPM, so I don't see what bringing that cheater into this has to do with anything at all.
James Moody
I don't know what you mean by clean.. you can hear every note he picks. You can't even TELL if you are alternate picking or not. What in the world does that fake idiot Della Vega have to do with our argument here? Vega is a proven fake. I am FINE with John Taylor losing his record. What I am NOT fine with is John Taylor losing his record to someone who "wanks" their way through the piece of music, not playing it correctly, not picking every note, sliding notes instead of fingering them all.
Also, If I were you, I wouldn't assume the kind of guitarist I am without knowing what you are talking about. Kid, I can play circles around you, and break your ego so fast that you won't have time to pick it up.
Anyone can see that you are reaching man. Your "record" is a joke.. Learn the song properly, pick every note, and stop being an arrogant donkey.
www.youtube.com/user/shredisnotdead1986
Taylor Sterling
Okay here is a test for you james watch this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pfvOP6rXP_I
With the link tell me if you think he played it correctly to break his record of 320BPM
Taylor Sterling
Okay here is a test for you james watch this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pfvOP6rXP_I
Taylor Sterling
his video on wired magazine at 800BPM GET REAL I have seen it and THER IS NO WAY! you can even tell ANY notes he is playing because his amp is something a kid get with a starter pack. If his sound was clear like mine is you would be able to tell he isn't playing it accuratly at all. If you were any sort of guitarist you would see via his tone that he isn't accurate in what he does in music.
YOUR A JOHN TAYLOR FAN AND YOU JUST DONT WANT TO SEE HIM LOSE HIS RECORD.
ONCE AGAIN I DO NOT POST COMMENTS ABOUT OTHER GUITARIST THE ONLY REASON I AM NOW IS BECAUSE I AM BEING FORCED TO DEFEND MYSELF.
James Moody
Dude, John did get past 380.. In fact, he has a video on the Wired magazine site, and plays at 800 BPM nearly flawlessly. John holds the record period. As far as I'm concerned, your 999BPM record is not even real.. John is the REAL holder, even if your name and video are up here.
Taylor Sterling
John taylor NEVER even got past 380BPM i can also get a slowed down version and show everyone as well. I dont wanna to do that to another hard working guitar player but i will if i have to! All the comments on john taylors say Guinness was easily fooled with his performance
James Moody
Correction below... If Taylor can't do 600 as good as John, then how did he get a record for 999BPM.
James Moody
Watch John Taylor's 600BPM. It's faster, Cleaner, He picks every note, and fingers every note precisely. If you watch Taylor Sterling's 600 BPM, he doesn't pick every note, he doesn't finger every note precisely, and it is most definitely not anywhere near as accurate as Johns. Watching the two back to back, and comparing them, will tell anyone that I am right. My question is, If Taylor can't even do 600BPM as good as John did, then how did he get a record for 900BPM? That makes no sense. And if you want to say, accuracy doesn't matter, it's just the speed that matters.... well, Taylor's 600 took 4 seconds longer than Johns, there you go.
James Moody
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVHVXopRmI8
Nancy Kate Phillippi
Well Taylor, I think you should submit it to Guinness. I'm interested to see what they say.
Nancy Kate Phillippi
Taylor, I think you should submit it to Guinness. I'm interested to see what they say.
James Moody
Dan. Unfortunately, I can't post the file on youtube, mainly because it's an audio file, and I don't know how.. The link I post here, should be a direct, and quick download usable in media player or similar. If you don't have these strict rules, or rules similar to ones I've stated below, it will be very easy for any guitar player to just BS their way through the song, missing notes, sliding their hand around to look fast, go off time.. Who wants a record for something they didn't actually do? I sure don't. If I were to get this record, you can bet I would not even submit a video unless it was absolutely flawless. I don't know how many of the community here are guitar players, or musicians.. but if you just have the SLIGHTEST musical ear, you can hear in my file, that this is NOT correct, and should not be a new record.
James Moody
As far as rules.
Song must be played in entirety. Played the same exact way at every speed. Song must be played without error, meaning not missed notes. No flat or sharp notes. If it is not accurate, one is NOT PLAYING IT RIGHT, and shouldn't be awarded ANY record. Record Setter should pride themselves in awarding this record to those who ACTUALLY play it properly. If not, then it's just one big joke.
Nancy Kate Phillippi
Well Taylor, I like your video! Kudos. :-)
Taylor Sterling
Notice how all these people make an account ONLY to come after my video they dont comment on ANYTHING ELSE on the internet. I dont know but it seems set up to me
Antonio Davilas
My grandmother DOES BEST!MIXED NOTES! BADDD
Nancy Kate Phillippi
I think that a few blips are okay. I think that the title of "Fastest Guitar Player" maybe could be changed to something more appropriate to the situation, such as, "Fastest Rendition of 'Flight of the Bumblebee' on Guitar". It seems less... less... battle-worthy that way.
Antonio Davilas
BAD TECNIQUE
Taylor Sterling
dan RULES
Here the entire song from world record BPM Missing notes should not be permitted and meternome and timer dont need to be onscreen since john didn't need it to send to guinness.
However i can send you my backing tracks to prove the speeds im playing also you will notice it only takes me 16 seconds to finish the entire piece of music at 999BPM
Dan Rollman
James I'd encourage you to upload your file (is it a video) in an easier to watch/listen to manner. YouTube, maybe?
To everyone: what rules do you think should be created for this category? Should we insist on hearing the entire song? Are missed notes permitted? Should we insist up on both a timer and metronome onscreen?
Let's keep the dialogue constructive and work toward creating a rule system that is acceptable by all.
Taylor Sterling
I NEVER SUPPORT DOING THIS TO ANOTHER GUITARIST HOWEVER!!!
If anyone uses MYSPEED TO SLOW DOWN JOHN TAYLORS PERFORMANCE AT 380BPM IT IS INACCURATE NOT TO MENTION HIS SOUND MAKES EVERYTHING UNRECOGNISABLE TO THE POINT WHERE YOU ALMOST CANT SLOW HIS PERFORMANCE DOWN BECAUSE OF HOW LOW QUALITY HIS GUITAR SOUND IS.
ONCE AGAIN I DO NOT POST THINGS LIKE THIS AGAINST ANYONE HOWEVER I AM BEING FORCED TO.
James Moody
https://myaccount.dropsend.com/pickup/file/cfd26c7310fa5b32
James Moody
I'm not trolling man, I call it like I see it. You are an extremely fast player, but that doesn't mean anything if it's not accurate. I've provided the link to back up my claims. If people listen and still think you've successfully beaten the record, then so be it. But as they say in the X-Files " The Truth is out There".
I'm not jealous at all. I have no reason to be jealous. Sure, I've seen the one at your old high school too..and again, it's very fast but not completely accurate. The accuracy is what matters, along with the speed. One of the rules of GWR you know, is the song must be played without error. Any mistake is an error, and the performance is full of mistakes.
Taylor Sterling
James Moody STOP TROLLING your just jelous because you were getting close to beating john taylors record yourself here is a second performance of me playing it anyway. in fact your probs just a friend of his or a MASSIVE fan so nothing will change your mind
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLgVDQ_Ykc8
James Moody
https://myaccount.dropsend.com/pickup/file/cfd26c7310fa5b32 Listen for yourselves.
James Moody
Here you go everyone, fans, admins, moderators, and followers... here is a link to a half speed .wav file of this entire performance, in which it is easy to hear all of the inaccuracies in the piece of music.. Missed notes, off time passages, wrong notes. The higher the tempo, the worse it gets.. take a listen. https://myaccount.dropsend.com/pickup/file/cfd26c7310fa5b32
Tiago della
SEE HOW IS A TECHNIQUE, WELL PERFORMED WITH 1.200 BPM AND 1.500 BPM ! WITH ACCELERATED VIDEO
enter link description here
Taylor Sterling
Sure mate whatever!
James Moody
Listen.. with an attitude like yours, you don't even deserve a record. Arrogance will get you nowhere. Anyone who slows down your performance can and will easily see and hear that after 300BPM you don't play without error. I'm sorry that there is no getting through to YOU. What I am saying is completely able to be proven, all it takes is for the moderators, and or community, whoever accepts or declines these attempts to listen to it slowed down at every speed, and they will see that it's not flawless, it's not completely accurate, and you change the ending up in the last three speeds. Even at 170BPM you went out of time a couple times... that's called an error, and that should have been it.. But for some reason record setter has decided to give you the record.
Taylor Sterling
I did play it Flawlessly i can see that there is no getting through to you I am the fastest and the most Accurate in the world Enough said.
James Moody
Ok, I can see that you don't care.. if you did care, you wouldn't be happy with a sloppy performance.. I can see that you are happy with a sloppy performance. That is fine.. Just goes to show the level of maturity of which you are capable, and it doesn't seem very high.
You are not the fastest in the world. To be the fastest in the world, you have to play accurately, or it doesn't matter. Anyone can move their hands very fast up and down the fretboard hitting "most" of the notes. Not everyone can play it flawlessly at that speed though. I am in no way saying that I can do this, I'm just saying that you didn't, at least not in the video.
Taylor Sterling
I dont care cause i know my performance is better than anyones of this piece! so it doesn't matter to me what you think Im the Fastest In the world and thats all there is to it even if i did stuff up a note or two (WHICH I DIDN'T!!!) it would still make me faster than anyone else anyway
Good day to you sir!
James Moody
Use MySpeed to slow the 300BPM down to half speed at 150BPM, at that speed, you will still hear messed up notes, and the audio quality is almost perfect.. since that was played imperfectly, the attempt should technically ended there. Putting hard work and effort into something great is just great, but getting a record for something that is not completely accurate is not great.. I wouldn't want the record unless I played it flawless, perfect, in time, pick every note, and the same way at every speed, and that did not happen in this performance.
Taylor Sterling
Now i KNOW john taylor didn't play it accuratly otherwise Guinness would not have frozen the world record to put it under analysis.
And not to mention one of my witness's was registered with a level 9 classical guitar diploma from a College in London and he has verified it as well as another registered guitar teacher with 25 yrs up his sleeve at the biggest music teaching school in melbourne australia.
James Moody
No problem, Nancy. I just want to make sure that people actually take the time to verify in every possible way that something is accurate before accepting it.. If you don't play every note in a piece of music properly, then you aren't playing the piece of music, therefore In my opinion the attempt should not be accepted. It should revert back to John Taylor. He played every note with accuracy, and played it the SAME way every time. This to me, is a joke.
Taylor Sterling
(Myspeed) can be used to slow down what im playing however the audio quality is still degraded beyond Audability however slowed down just enough you will hear all the notes played correctly.
People just like to make others hard work about themselves and how much better they are when they aren't the ones putting themselves out there doing something.
Nancy Kate Phillippi
Thanks! :-P I have been looking for something like that for a long time... 😄
James Moody
Nancy. The program is called MySpeed. It is a very simple program that allows you to slow down or speed up any video you watch as long as the program is running. It suffers very very minimal audio quality loss at slow speeds, but not enough to make it so you can't hear the notes clearly. I used this program while watching the video a few times, to check the faster tempos for flaws, by slowing it down. As stated below, I did find discrepancies in the performance from 300 BPM and up. The program is available online in a 7 day free trial version for anyone who would like to prove this to themselves. I have no doubt that Taylor is very fast, also, he is probably a good musician. The only thing I'm saying is, from inspection of the video with MySpeed, I personally don't believe the attempt should have been accepted.
Nancy Kate Phillippi
James, what is the program? I don't feel obliged to take sides, but I do think I'm glad tiago's rendition was denied. I am not a pro video editor, but I do edit videos and love to do it. From prior experience, I know that his attempt was fake simply by watching his strumming. It was choppy, rough and jumpy. This is because minor, minor flaws in his hand movement (I.e. moving three mm to the left as he strummed) add up in high speed. This make his hand look like its kind of twitching. Watch valid attempts, they are much smoother.
James Moody
OK, I'm just going to point a few things out for everyone to consider. First of all, there is no clock in the video.. All speed records need a clock to ensure accuracy. The metronome is there of course, but there is no visible way to verify how fast the metronome is actually going, just numbers on a board. As an advanced shred guitar player myself, I can attest to this fact here, the picking hand is picking 8th notes on the higher speeds, where it should be picking 16th notes to follow perfectly with the fingers.. a true test of speed should be measured by both hands, in sync together. I have a program that allows one to slow video down, without affecting the audio pitch or tone, upon doing this, I have seen that the song is played differently every time at higher speeds, along with notes being missed, or "bum" notes as I like to put it. The ending is played differently the last 4 speeds.. I am not saying it's not fast, it's just not fast AND accurate, speed doesn't matter, if it isn't correct. I'd like to know that if someone holds this record, they can play it perfectly, the same, and pick every note, every time, or else to me, and a lot of other guitar players, it's not impressive, and shouldn't be considered a real record. Just my two cents.
Simon Kirk
a
PeteM
Very cool Taylor! Any other speed records you got up your sleeves?
Taylor Sterling
JOING THE FACEBBOOK PAGE: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Taylor-Sterling-for-Worlds-Fastest-Guitarist/268958936495962
Taylor Sterling
HERE IS HOW YOU CAN TELL IT IS NOT FAKE!
Second video where i play 999BPM at my high school shows alot of people walking so its proof its not speed up watch?v=ZLgVDQ_Ykc8
FILMED AT THE BIGGEST MUSIC STORE IN MELBOURNE!!!! Would they let me hold an event where i faked the world record?? allansmusicbillyhyde.blogspot.¬com.au/2012/03/sterling-speed.¬html
people aren't walking faster other wise they would be walking so fast they would leave a blur
The clock in the background makes no diffrence because i have a person standing in the background of mine.
Tiago della
Tiago Della Vega did a new record, the current video of him with records of 620 bpm and 750 bpm are false, is effect of video (acceleration).
enter link description here
Tiago della
enter link description here
Tiago della
750 BPM? FAKE NEW RECORD WORD of TIAGO DELLA VEGA SEE VIDEO
Alex Cunningham
Yep, the timer is very clearly outside the screen. Voting fake.
Nicholas Filer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRZoHzGtMQc Here is absolute proof that this record is fake. The clock goes outside of the screen for God's sake, there is no possible way this is real.
Norzamri Lagenda
recordsetter is more more better than guinness...!!!!
Andy Shick
Doesn't even sound right. But also, clock isn't on same screen
Jacob Wannemacher
has Guinness verified it yet?
PeteM
Just my personal opinion but... I think this needs to be titled "Fastest Rendition of Flight of the Bumblebees on Guitar." This is RecordSetter, where even the most specific records can be set. Not Guinness.
Dan Rollman
Jane and John: Our model is built around community input in deciding what is and isn't a world record. I'd love to hear your specific thoughts on how Della Vega's attempt is "fake." This is an extremely challenging category to moderate. We want to do everything we can to ensure fairness moving forward. Thanks in advance for your thoughts.
Dan Rollman
Impressive performance, but doesn't yet follow the criteria in this category. Sam and Jon, I'd love dialogue on how best gather accurate documentation so we can see the bar of this category raised moving forward. It's like real-life Crossroads!
Sam Clark
john taylor, Im trying to learn the song this hole week, and I do know how to follow a metronome. I just dont know why I keep making shitty videos. Im getting my record set at guitar center this week. Hope to break your record soon, I got up to 800bpm I know it sounds impossible but I did it. I had 8 people tell me that I did it even my guitar teacher. I dont think anyone will get close to 800bpm anytime soon. I could just do it at 650bpm for shits and giggles.
Record Setter
Glad to see another shit attempt was denied. Seriously, learn the song and learn how to follow a metronome.
Peter Craig
John I think the intent of the recordsetter email is not that the record was broken, but rather "your record has been attempted and may have been broken". It's a way to get the original setter or current holder to check on the submission and give opinion and validation/moderation as you've just done. I'd love to see this record broken, but I'd say it's going to take a highly technical group of moderators/witnesses to verify a valid attempt.
Record Setter
If you're going to try and beat my record at least learn the song you're supposed to play; don't just hit random notes. Also, 700 bpm is WAY WAY WAY faster than that. This denied attempt wasn't even being played half as fast as my 600 bpm. I don't know why recordsetter.com even notified me that my record was broken when it was clearly not even touched.