All Comments for this Record Category

• response to this attempt

  Mick Cullen

  Fri, 29 Jul 2011 10:58:28 GMT

  Andy-- I definitely did not have any experience with editing video or creating clips of videos before I got involved with RecordSetter either. I basically figured it out with Windows Movie Maker, which turned out to be pretty easy to use. That would be my recommendation-- your computer may very well have that program on it, depending on how new it is. Keep on piling up those records, Andy!

  LIKE (1) · REPLY
• response to this attempt

  Crystal Pelphrey

  Fri, 29 Jul 2011 09:25:41 GMT

  This is Andy, Thanks Mick, I guess that's why verification of these records hasn't been approved of mine, I didn't break them down. I really don't know how to go about doing it on my computer. I might resubmit my claim and try to make up a totally different record out of this under a different record title. Once again thanks and Congrats to you and Carl and everyone at your radio station that took part in Carls record. I think it's really cool that you guys do alot of your records while live on the radio. That really does alot to help get record setter's name out there. that's awesome and I have alot of respect for you guys for this, it seems like you guys really have alot of fun doing this stuff!! and like I said you guys have my total respect. Once again thanks and best of luck to you guys when you attempt to set and break more records in the future.

  LIKE (1) · REPLY
• response to this attempt

  Mick Cullen

  Thu, 28 Jul 2011 17:25:18 GMT

  Andy--

  You will probably need to submit video of each individual record in order to get it approved, according to the guidelines. You can't just submit one video for all 26 records. I had to break Carl's video into separate clips for each record attempted to get them all approved.

  LIKE (1) · REPLY
• response to previous attempt

  Mick Cullen

  Wed, 04 May 2011 16:49:43 GMT

  Truly, by definition, this record has to increase by at least two in order for it to really be broken. First, you have to set one more record than the current record...THEN you get credit for the extra record of most records in a minute. Tying it is insufficient.

  LIKE (1) · REPLY
• response to previous attempt

  Mick Cullen

  Wed, 04 May 2011 16:46:30 GMT

  I'm going to have to disagree here, folks. This record should not count. Andy set seven records in a minute, not eight. He did not break the record for most records set in a minute-- he tied it. The previous record was seven, and Andy also set seven. He cannot be credited for his claimed eighth record (most records set in a minute) since he didn't break the existing record for most records set in a minute. He has tied Carl Cutler's record. He hasn't broken it.

  LIKE (1) · REPLY
• response to previous attempt

  Andy Pelphrey

  Thu, 28 Apr 2011 07:02:50 GMT

  Thanks Simon, I'm a big fan of alot of the records you set as well. If I'm going to do very many more records that involve running around like I did in that one, I'm really going to have to get in shape again!! Thanks

  LIKE (1) · REPLY
• response to previous attempt

  Simon Kirk

  Wed, 27 Apr 2011 10:17:35 GMT

  Andy - that there is some talent!

  LIKE (1) · REPLY
• response to previous attempt

  Danny Infinite

  Mon, 20 Apr 2009 22:33:12 GMT

  Well it was set within the minute, so I vote yes. And to Jake, you are my hero sir.

  LIKE (1) · REPLY
• response to previous attempt

  Dan Rollman

  Mon, 20 Apr 2009 21:37:26 GMT

  Should the fifth record count? It's very meta. Our brains at URDB HQ are confused. Let us know what you think.

  LIKE (1) · REPLY