We think only a record holder can know what you go through to set a record, so we only let people that
have already set world records downvote other people's records.
What can I do?
Go set a record! If you can think of it, you can set a new world record for it.
well considering I've only been juggling for one year, it's hard to know every fact and term for juggling 100%. Sorry i don't have the 20 odd years experience Brian.
title should say fastest time to do 100 catches juggling a ball, juggling ring & a juggling club - criteria should state size of ball - must use a standard juggling ring - must use a standard juggling club - time stops immediately at the 100th catch. That is how every criteria in general should look recordsetter details are the utmost critical importance for every single record. If you want to be taken as a serious record setting site you should pay more to attention to details to every single record on this site!
because that is the correct juggling term & if this site wants to be an official world record site it should abide by official terms of the sport & art of juggling if not then it total mockery of the sport & besides I beat this yesterday & after 20 years of given my life to the art & history of juggling I have the right to say to label this as catches
then explain to me what juggling is because after 20 years of doing it I must be an idiot because I thought the definition of juggling is tossing & catching more than 3 objects but I must live in the stone age because I am stupid. Brian Pankey is stupid & yes this is sarcasm. So what is this record fastest 100 tosses or fastest 100 catches?
All Comments for this Record Category
Pete Moyer
Okay to restate what Brian said but in a more logical and less demeaning way...
The title should read "Fastest time to 100 catches with..."
"Cascade" isn't really a juggling verb.
Mitchie Dagger
well considering I've only been juggling for one year, it's hard to know every fact and term for juggling 100%. Sorry i don't have the 20 odd years experience Brian.
Brian Pankey
title should say fastest time to do 100 catches juggling a ball, juggling ring & a juggling club - criteria should state size of ball - must use a standard juggling ring - must use a standard juggling club - time stops immediately at the 100th catch. That is how every criteria in general should look recordsetter details are the utmost critical importance for every single record. If you want to be taken as a serious record setting site you should pay more to attention to details to every single record on this site!
Brian Pankey
this should be called most catches
Mitchie Dagger
why?
Brian Pankey
because that is the correct juggling term & if this site wants to be an official world record site it should abide by official terms of the sport & art of juggling if not then it total mockery of the sport & besides I beat this yesterday & after 20 years of given my life to the art & history of juggling I have the right to say to label this as catches
Mitchie Dagger
But i wasn't doing most catches. I was doing 100. Fastest time to complete those one hundred. Therefore most catches would be wrong.
Brian Pankey
then explain to me what juggling is because after 20 years of doing it I must be an idiot because I thought the definition of juggling is tossing & catching more than 3 objects but I must live in the stone age because I am stupid. Brian Pankey is stupid & yes this is sarcasm. So what is this record fastest 100 tosses or fastest 100 catches?
Mitchie Dagger
yes but you said MOST catches. i was not doing it within a time limit. calm down pankey.
Mitchie Dagger
take a chill pill brian.