All Comments for this Record Category

• response to previous attempt

  JN2

  Sat, 30 Jun 2012 15:20:47 GMT

  How does Ben have the faster time when Ben is faster by 2 seconds?

  LIKE · REPLY
• response to previous attempt

  Cyril Navidad

  Thu, 24 Nov 2011 12:10:59 GMT

  Great attempt, Raymond.. but you missed a lot of numbers. :(

  LIKE (1) · REPLY
• response to this attempt

  Simon Kirk

  Sun, 10 Jul 2011 14:57:05 GMT

  Also, note to Rob and team: the time on my record is incorrectly displayed- it should be 10 mins and 37 seconds, not just 37 seconds. thanks simon

  LIKE (1) · REPLY
• response to this attempt

  Simon Kirk

  Sun, 10 Jul 2011 14:55:53 GMT

  Now the question is whether you are going to try and de-throne me. Think you can do it?

  LIKE (1) · REPLY
• response to previous attempt

  Ben Jenkins

  Sun, 10 Jul 2011 12:50:13 GMT

  Nice catch Simon. Good to see that there are people out there willing to make sure that a record is truly a record.

  LIKE (1) · REPLY
• response to previous attempt

  Simon Kirk

  Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:41:53 GMT

  But nice try though.

  LIKE (1) · REPLY
• response to previous attempt

  Simon Kirk

  Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:34:05 GMT

  This is not a record. You skip number 585. I watched the whole thing. Twice. Then I beat it. Except it wasn't beating it because your record is not a record.

  LIKE (1) · REPLY
• response to previous attempt

  Alex Cunningham

  Sat, 18 Jun 2011 19:23:14 GMT

  eleven twenty?

  LIKE (1) · REPLY
• response to previous attempt

  Peter Craig

  Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:42:40 GMT

  I agree Alex, discussion on why constitutes a number name should be made.... What happens after 1000 - it defeats the purpose of the record when you say one one twenty for 1120 instead of "one thousand, one hundred and twenty".

  LIKE (1) · REPLY
• response to previous attempt

  Alex Cunningham

  Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:21:33 GMT

  You're allowed one-twenty instead of one hundred twenty (for instance)?

  LIKE (1) · REPLY