All Comments for this Record Category

• response to previous attempt

  Brian Pankey

  Mon, 05 Dec 2011 21:43:50 GMT

  thanks for changing this.

  LIKE (1) · REPLY
• response to previous attempt

  Brian Pankey

  Mon, 05 Dec 2011 19:01:01 GMT

  stop adding criteria that was not mine recordsetter or I'll quit!

  LIKE (1) · REPLY
• response to previous attempt

  Brian Pankey

  Mon, 05 Dec 2011 18:59:59 GMT

  I did not put up that rule of one catch racket. Watch the other record.

  LIKE (1) · REPLY
• response to previous attempt

  Brian Pankey

  Mon, 05 Dec 2011 18:57:57 GMT

  both hand catch count

  LIKE (1) · REPLY
• response to previous attempt

  Brian Pankey

  Mon, 05 Dec 2011 18:57:43 GMT

  who ever put that rule up about one catch is screwing me!

  LIKE (1) · REPLY
• response to previous attempt

  Brian Pankey

  Mon, 05 Dec 2011 18:56:18 GMT

  94 not 47

  LIKE (1) · REPLY
• response to previous attempt

  Brian Pankey

  Mon, 05 Dec 2011 18:55:51 GMT

  unbelievable taking away my records cause someone moderator can't follow directions 94 is the record

  LIKE (1) · REPLY
• response to previous attempt

  Brian Pankey

  Mon, 05 Dec 2011 18:54:55 GMT

  again I did not fail you're supposed to count both hands watch the other record

  LIKE (1) · REPLY
• response to this attempt

  Peter Craig

  Thu, 03 Jun 2010 06:01:11 GMT

  I don't understand the values here... the record is 20, the ball hit the racket 37 times, and there were 78 catches overall so what's the record?

  LIKE (1) · REPLY